Silicon Valley wrote about Kohls v Ellison, where an expert from Stanford serving as an expert for the state of Minnesota submitted false information generated by AI.
Original Jurisdiction wrote about our case, Kohls v. Ellison, where the state of Minnesota filed an export that contained AI hallucinations.
Instapundit covered our case, Kohls v. Ellison, where an expert for the state of Minnesota submitted AI-generated documents containing fake studies. Read more at Instapundit.
The Minnesota Reformer reports on the incredible expert declaration by an “AI and misinformation” expert filed in Kohls v. Ellison.
Volokh Conspiracy covers HLLI's motion to exclude testimony from an “AI and misinformation” expert in Kohls v. Ellison, who ironically cited fictional journal articles in his declaration, which were apparently hallucinated by an AI model like ChatGPT.
The Wall Street Journal wrote about HLLI's free speech victory in California over Gov. Newsom's "deepfake" law.
Alpha News in Minnesota wrote about our lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Minnesota’s law, § 609.771, “Use of Deep Fake Technology to Influence and Election,” which bans sharing AI-generated content intended to influence elections.
The Brainerd Dispatch covered Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute's lawsuit in Minnesota on behalf of YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan."
Reason wrote about our lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison, where we are defending the popular YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan" and Rep. Mary Franson of Minnesota House District 12B and their right to free speech, including parody and satire. "Mr Reagan earns a livelihood from his content, and Rep. Franson communicates with her constituents and party members on social media," according to a press release from their lawyers at the Hamilton Lincoln Law…
HLLI and Upper Midwest Law Center filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Minnesota's law, § 609.771, which bans AI-generated political satire.
