NonStop Local Billings: Conservative public interest firm joins AI free speech election lawsuit
NonStop Local Billings wrote about our free speech case, Accountability in State Government and Dan Bartel v. Austin Knudsen.
NonStop Local Billings wrote about our free speech case, Accountability in State Government and Dan Bartel v. Austin Knudsen.
Daily Montanan wrote about our free speech case, Accountability in State Government and Dan Bartel v. Austin Knudsen.
The Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, a public interest law firm, sued Montana officials on behalf of Accountability in State Government, a Montana independent political committee, and its founder, former state legislator Dan Bartel.
The Center Square wrote about Leroy v. Livingston Manor School District, in which an appeals court ruled in favor of our client, affirming that public schools cannot punish students for off-campus speech, even if the speech is controversial.
Jane Coleman at Legal Insurrection covered our case, Leroy v. Livingston Manor School District, in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled in favor of a Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute (HLLI) client, reversing a lower court’s decision and affirming that public schools cannot punish students for off-campus speech, even if the speech is controversial.
Bloomberg Law wrote about HLLI's case, Kohls v. Ellison, challenging Minnesota’s law, “Use of Deep Fake Technology to Influence and Election,” which bans sharing AI-generated content intended to influence elections.
Our co-founder and director of litigation, Ted Frank, was mentioned in an article in The Washington Free Beacon about New York University School of Law canceling a Federalist Society event.
HLLI co-founder Ted Frank joined John Solomon on "John Solomon Reports" to discuss the group’s recent free-speech victory in Kohls v. Bonta.
Just the News wrote about our recent win in Kohls v. Bonta, when a federal court permanently enjoined with respect to Christopher Kohls, also known as popular You Tube star, "Mr Reagan", and other plaintiffs, a California law that barred the sharing of political satire created with AI technology.
The Volokh Conspiracy covered HLLI's recent victory in Kohls v. Bonta, in which a federal court permanently struck down a California law that barred the sharing of political satire created with AI technology.