The Wall Street Journal: How to hold anti-Israel protesters accountable for breaking the law by disrupting traffic.
Jason Riley wrote about the possibility of suing anti-Israel traffic-blocking protestors, as HLLI co-founder Ted Frank suggested.
The New York Post: Chair of Harvard’s new antisemitism task force accused of antisemitism
The New York Post wrote about the chair of Harvard's antisemitism task force being accused of antisemitism.
The American Spectator: Supreme Court Should Reexamine New York Times v. Sullivan
HLLI's president, Anna St. John wrote an opinion article in the American Spectator arguing that the ‘Sullivan’ precedent, has no basis in the history of the First Amendment, and recent events illustrate why the Court should heed calls to reexamine its misguided precedent.
AUDIO: Ted Frank Discusses Taking Action Against Traffic-Blocking Activists
Director of Litigation Ted Frank appeared on the Jason Rantz Show to discuss a potential legal action against organized activists blocking major highways like Seattle’s I-5, Chicago’s Lake Shore Drive, and New York’s Holland Tunnel.
Reuters: In Wawa class action, appeals court tosses fee award that’s higher than class recovery
Alison Frankel wrote about HLLI's successful appeal of a $3.2 million attorneys' fee award in the Wawa Data Security settlement, where the district court awarded attorneys more than the class.
Brian T. Fitzpatrick & Ted Frank: Should Conservatives Embrace the Current Class Action System?
Ted Frank appears on the Future of Freedom podcast to rebut Prof. Brian Fitzpatrick's contention that conservatives should prefer class actions to government regulation.
WSJ op-ed: Class-Action Lawyers Play Quota Games
Adam Schulman: If counsel assigns work, or courts appoint attorneys, on the basis of anything other than merit, it violates the duty to pursue class members’ interests.
Ted Frank: A Rhode Island case illustrates the folly of tackling climate change in the courts.
Ted Frank: This case doesn’t belong in the courts. Newport County Superior Court is unlikely to arrive at the optimal policy that balances the need for fossil fuels in the economy with an attempt to reduce global carbon emissions.
WSJ op-ed: Justice Jackson’s Incredible Statistic
Ted Frank: Jackson’s dissent from the ruling on affirmative action makes an obviously implausible claim.
FedSoc: Countering the Biden Administration’s ESG Push: A Litigation Update on Utah v. Walsh
HLLI's Anna St. John and Ned Hedley write at The Federalist Society: The plaintiffs challenging the ESG Rule argue that it is contrary to the ERISA statute, exceeds the DOL’s authority, and is arbitrary and capricious. Utah v. Walsh also presents separation of powers questions.