Law & Crime reported on our case, Kohls v. Ellison, where the state of Minnesota's expert submitted evidence citing AI-generated studies that do not exist.
Silicon Valley wrote about Kohls v Ellison, where an expert from Stanford serving as an expert for the state of Minnesota submitted false information generated by AI.
Original Jurisdiction wrote about our case, Kohls v. Ellison, where the state of Minnesota filed an export that contained AI hallucinations.
The Minnesota Reformer reports on the incredible expert declaration by an “AI and misinformation” expert filed in Kohls v. Ellison.
Volokh Conspiracy covers HLLI's motion to exclude testimony from an “AI and misinformation” expert in Kohls v. Ellison, who ironically cited fictional journal articles in his declaration, which were apparently hallucinated by an AI model like ChatGPT.
Law.com wrote about our case, Kohls v. Bonta, defending free speech in California.
The Alabama Political Reporter covered our recent free speech victory when Attorney General Steve Marshall committed that parody falls outside the scope of the recently enacted HB 172.
HLLI achieved a First Amendment victory Friday by securing Alabama Attorney General Steven Marshall’s commitment that its client Christopher Kohls’s artificial intelligence generated political parody falls outside the scope of the recently based HB 172.
The Southern California Record wrote about HLLI's free speech in California for YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan."
HLLI, representing two non-profit nursing homes and state affiliates, filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of a federal regulation by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that threatens the health, safety, and well-being of millions of nursing home patients across the county.
