HLLI filed a second lawsuit on behalf of AI-generated political satire, joined the by Upper Midwest Law Center, representing plaintiffs “Mr Reagan,” a political creator, and state Rep. Mary Franson challenging Minnesota Statutes § 609.771.
RedState wrote about HLLI's free speech lawsuit for YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan."
Fox News wrote about our lawsuit on behalf of “Mr Reagan,” a YouTuber who creates political satire videos.
Legal Insurrection wrote about HLLI's lawsuit for YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan" in defense of parody, satire, and free speech.
Law360 wrote about HLLI's free speech lawsuit for YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan."
New York Post wrote about cy pres and our lawsuit, In re Google Location History Litigation.
“I’m not familiar with the Alabama law. On the other hand, the governor of Alabama had hasn’t threatened our client the way the governor of California did,” HLLI Director Ted Frank told The Associated Press.
Coverage of HLLI's suit on behalf of Christopher Kohls, the person behind the “Mr Reagan,” YouTube and X accounts, who challenges the constitutionality of two bills that Gov. Gavin Newsom says outlaw “Mr Reagan” parody content illegal.
The Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute (HLLI), a public interest law firm, is suing California officials on behalf of “Mr Reagan,” a YouTuber who creates political satire videos.
HLLI filed a lawsuit on behalf of Christopher Kohls, known as “Mr Reagan,” the creator satirical political videos, including one called out by Gov. Gavin Newsom as being “illegal” under the bills he signed on September 17, 2024.
