Reuters wrote about President Trump nominating Anna St. John, the Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute's president and general counsel, to serve as a judge on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Our Co-Founder and Director of Litigation, Ted Frank, joined The Hugh Hewitt Show with guest host Kurt Schlichter. They discussed HLLI’s work pushing back against abusive class action practices, government overreach, and left-wing NGOs that organize disruptive demonstrations—along with Article III courts, potential SCOTUS vacancies, and more.
Just the News wrote about our amicus brief in The Buckeye Institute v. Internal Revenue Service. In our brief we argue that the right to anonymous association is essential to preserving a vibrant civil society in which individuals feel free to support causes they believe in without fear of retaliation.
Buckeye Reporter wrote about our amicus brief in The Buckeye Institute v. Internal Revenue Service. In our brief we argue that individuals should have the right to anonymously associate with organizations and support causes they believe in without fear of retaliation.
HLLI ifled an amicus brief in arguing that the IRS disclosure requirement for donors of nonprofits violates the First Amendment.
The Federalist covered our co-founder and director of litigation Ted Frank’s panel on CASA v. Trump at the 2025 Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention.
The Center Square wrote about Leroy v. Livingston Manor School District, in which an appeals court ruled in favor of our client, affirming that public schools cannot punish students for off-campus speech, even if the speech is controversial.
Jane Coleman at Legal Insurrection covered our case, Leroy v. Livingston Manor School District, in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled in favor of a Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute (HLLI) client, reversing a lower court’s decision and affirming that public schools cannot punish students for off-campus speech, even if the speech is controversial.
The Second Circuit has ruled in favor of HLLI's client, a student disciplined for an allegedly insensitive social media post, reversing a lower-court decision and affirming that public-schools cannot punish students for off-campus speech, even if the speech is controversial.
The Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute filed an amicus brief on behalf of Cato Institute economists challenging the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping “reciprocal” tariffs without congressional authorization.
