Federal Court Blocks Montana Law Restricting AI-Generated Political Speech
HLLI secured a preliminary injunction blocking Montana officials from enforcing the state’s restrictions on AI-generated political speech against its clients.
HLLI secured a preliminary injunction blocking Montana officials from enforcing the state’s restrictions on AI-generated political speech against its clients.
Reuters covered HLLI's free speech win in Montana, where we secured a preliminary injunction preventing Montana state officials from enforcing the state’s restrictive laws on AI-generated political speech against our clients.
On the eve of a federal court hearing over Montana’s restrictions on AI-generated political speech, Montana admits that political mailers targeted by three administrative complaints are satire and three complaints against plaintiffs will be dismissed.
NonStop Local Billings wrote about our free speech case, Accountability in State Government and Dan Bartel v. Austin Knudsen.
The Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, a public interest law firm, sued Montana officials on behalf of Accountability in State Government, a Montana independent political committee, and its founder, former state legislator Dan Bartel.
Matthew Monforton and HLLI representing former Montana State Legislator, Dan Bartel, and his Political Action Committee in their challenge to Montana's ban on political speech that uses AI-generated "deepfakes."