Bloomberg Lawwrote about HLLI's case,Kohls v. Ellison, challenging Minnesota’s law, “Use of Deep Fake Technology to Influence and Election,” which bans sharing AI-generated content intended to influence elections.
Reuters covered HLLI's lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison, defending free speech. An expert witness for the state of Minnesota submitted AI-generated documents containing fake, AI-generated citations, and a Minnesota judged ruled that this expert testimony must be excluded.
Center of the American Experiment, a think tank in Minnesota, wrote about HLLI's lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison.
Minnesota Reformer wrote an update about our case, Kohls v Ellison, in which a Stanford misinformation expert admitting to using artificial intelligence to draft a court document that contained fake citations about AI.
The Stanford Daily covered our case, Kohls v Ellison, defending free speech, and the state of Minnesota's AI expert, a Stanford professor, submitting AI-generated studies that don't exist.
The Volokh Conspiracy wrote about the recent fake AI-generated studies cited by the state of Minnesota's expert in our case, Kohls v Ellison.
Fox News covered HLLI's motion to exclude testimony from an “AI and misinformation” expert in Kohls v. Ellison.
Zero Hedge wrote about our free speech lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison, where one of the state of Minnesota's experts cited an AI-generated study that does not exist.
Law & Crime reported on our case, Kohls v. Ellison, where the state of Minnesota's expert submitted evidence citing AI-generated studies that do not exist.
Silicon Valley wrote about Kohls v Ellison, where an expert from Stanford serving as an expert for the state of Minnesota submitted false information generated by AI.
