Legal Insurrection: California’s Crackdown On AI-Generated Political Parody Is Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Says
Legal Insurrection wrote about HLLI's lawsuit for YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan" in defense of parody, satire, and free speech.
Law360: Conservative Pundit Seeks To Block Calif. AI Election Laws
Law360 wrote about HLLI's free speech lawsuit for YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan."
The American Spectator: Supreme Court Should Reexamine New York Times v. Sullivan
HLLI's president, Anna St. John wrote an opinion article in the American Spectator arguing that the ‘Sullivan’ precedent, has no basis in the history of the First Amendment, and recent events illustrate why the Court should heed calls to reexamine its misguided precedent.
HLLI Files Reply Brief in Couris v. Lawson
esterday, the Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute filed its reply brief with the Ninth Circuit in its appeal on behalf of Doctors Michael Couris and Michael Fitzgibbons challenging a new California state law, AB 2098.
Why is Jaafar & Mahdi Law Group trying to squelch criticism of a bad class action settlement?
At plaintiff's request, the Michigan state court enjoined Moughni, and forced a change to the Facebook page to put forward Ahmed's preferred view of the case. This is a scary First Amendment violation, and that the court signed off on it makes one wonder whether the court can fairly adjudicate objections to the settlement. Public Citizen is on the right side in this one, and, along with the ACLU, is litigating in favor of the objector's rights.
