Reuters covered HLLI's lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison, defending free speech.  An expert witness for the state of Minnesota submitted AI-generated documents containing fake, AI-generated citations, and a Minnesota judged ruled that this expert testimony must be excluded.

Center of the American Experiment, a think tank in Minnesota, wrote about HLLI's lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison.

Minnesota Reformer wrote an update about our case, Kohls v Ellison, in which a  Stanford misinformation expert admitting to using  artificial intelligence to draft a court document that contained fake citations about AI.

The Stanford Daily covered our case, Kohls v Ellison, defending free speech, and the state of Minnesota's AI expert, a Stanford professor, submitting AI-generated studies that don't exist.

The Volokh Conspiracy wrote about the recent fake AI-generated studies cited by the state of Minnesota's expert in our case, Kohls v Ellison.

Zero Hedge wrote about our free speech lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison, where one of the state of Minnesota's experts cited an AI-generated study that does not exist. 

Law & Crime reported on our case, Kohls v. Ellison, where the state of Minnesota's expert submitted evidence citing AI-generated studies that do not exist.

Silicon Valley wrote about Kohls v Ellison, where an expert from Stanford  serving as an expert for the state of Minnesota submitted false information generated by AI.