Press Highlights

A smoking gun in debate over consumer class actions?

 .76 percent of battery buyers filed claims to receive $3 or $6. If all of those claims turn out to be valid, McComb said in the declaration, the settlement fund will disburse $344,850 to class members. But remember: The settlement is supposed to be worth $49 million — the number on which plaintiffs lawyers have based their fee request. Even counting the $6 million in Duracell products that will be distributed to charities if the settlement is approved and the injunction against false labels the defendants agreed to, there’s an awfully big gap between the alleged value of the deal and the actual cash benefit to the class.

A smoking gun in debate over consumer class actions?

Appeals Court Kicks Back Apple Power Adapter Class-Action Settlement

In a unanimous ruling, the court agreed with objector Theodore Frank of the Center for Class Action Fairness that Ware -- who is now retired, so another judge will reconsider the award -- "rubber-stamped" a deal that "structured to obscure actual relief" through Apple's agreement in advance to pay the suing legal firms up to $3 million of the award in attorney's fees and $100,000 in expenses, which the court said "cannot relieve the district court of its duty to assess fully the reasonableness of the fee request."

Appeals Court Kicks Back Apple Power Adapter Class-Action Settlement
Image credit: Jeremy Keith

Ninth Circuit Chucks Apple MagSafe Settlement, Chides Judge’s Oversight

The Center for Class Action Fairness, in its objection, noted that the settlement seemed designed to discourage consumers from actually collecting anything. While Apple had electronic records of MacBook purchasers who had replaced their power supplies and most of the procedures were online, the lawyers required their clients to submit refund forms in writing.

Ninth Circuit Chucks Apple MagSafe Settlement, Chides Judge’s Oversight

Lessons From CCAF On Designing Class Action Settlements

The recent decision by the Sixth Circuit, overturning approval of a class action settlement in In re Dry Max Pampers Litigation (6th Cir. Aug. 2, 2013), is another in a string of wins for the Center for Class Action Fairness, which objects to settlements it considers unjust, and another reminder to class action defendants that they have to bear objections in mind when negotiating settlements.

Lessons From CCAF On Designing Class Action Settlements

Appeals Court Says Legal Fees in Diaper Suit are Ir-rashional

That settlement was challenged by the Center for Class Action Fairness, a Washington nonprofit that challenges class-action settlements it views to be unfair. “When attorneys get more than the class is getting, it’s an unfair settlement,” said Ted Frank, the organization’s founder. “The class counsel owes an obligation to its clients to get a good deal for them before it gets paid.”

Appeals Court Says Legal Fees in Diaper Suit are Ir-rashional

P&G’s diaper rash settlement flushed by court

“We’re very pleased – we’re doing this to play traffic cop and make the law better,” Frank said. “The class attorneys have a fiduciary responsibility to their clients, but a lot of attorneys prefer to just negotiate settlements where they get all the money and their clients get imaginary relief.” Far too often, Frank said, judges rubber stamp such settlements.

P&G’s diaper rash settlement flushed by court

Class Action Activist asks SCOTUS to Review Charity-Only Settlements

On Friday, Frank and lawyers from Baker Hostetler filed a petition for a writ of certiorari at the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to review the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ approval of a $9.5 million settlement of class action allegations that Facebook’s now-dismantled “Beacon” program violated users’ privacy by revealing their online purchases.

Class Action Activist asks SCOTUS to Review Charity-Only Settlements
Search this website Type then hit enter to search