The Wall Street Journal: Election Deepfakes Prompt State Crackdowns—and First Amendment Concerns
The Wall Street Journal wrote about HLLI's free speech victory in California over Gov. Newsom's "deepfake" law.
The Wall Street Journal wrote about HLLI's free speech victory in California over Gov. Newsom's "deepfake" law.
Alpha News in Minnesota wrote about our lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Minnesota’s law, § 609.771, “Use of Deep Fake Technology to Influence and Election,” which bans sharing AI-generated content intended to influence elections.
Washington Examiner wrote about HLLI's lawsuit, Kohls v, Bonta, on behalf of “Mr Reagan,” a YouTuber who creates political satire videos.
The Epoch Times covered our victory for free speech in our California lawsuit, Kohls v Bonta.
Blaze media wrote about our free speech victory in our lawsuit on behalf of “Mr Reagan,” a YouTuber who creates political satire videos.
The Brainerd Dispatch covered Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute's lawsuit in Minnesota on behalf of YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan."
Reason wrote about our lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison, where we are defending the popular YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan" and Rep. Mary Franson of Minnesota House District 12B and their right to free speech, including parody and satire. "Mr Reagan earns a livelihood from his content, and Rep. Franson communicates with her constituents and party members on social media," according to a press release from their lawyers at the Hamilton Lincoln Law…
The California Globe wrote about HLLI's free speech victory when a judge blocked Gov. Newsom's "deepfake" law.
Associated Press featured our victory in stopping California’s law targeting election-related deepfakes.
San Francisco Chronicle wrote about our free speech victory in Kohls v. Bonta.