The Jewish Press: Jewish Voice for Peace Sued for Blocking Major Arteries in DC
The Jewish Press wrote about Faoro v. Jewish Voice for Peace Inc., et al., HLLI's case against traffic-disrupting protestors.
The Jewish Press wrote about Faoro v. Jewish Voice for Peace Inc., et al., HLLI's case against traffic-disrupting protestors.
Legal Insurrection wrote about our case, Faoro v. Jewish Voice for Peace Inc., et al. We are suing organizations and individuals who engaged in illegal traffic blockades in Washington, D.C.
The Washington Free Beacon wrote about HLLI's case, Faoro v. Jewish Voice for Peace Inc., et al., in which HLLI is suing organizations and individuals who engaged in traffic blockades in Washington, D.C.
HLLI filed a lawsuit today in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia concerning the February 1, 2024 blockade of several intersections leading into Washington, D.C.
HLLI represents a victim of the February 1, 2024 pro-Hamas blockade of several intersections leading into Washington, D.C. during the morning rush hour.
The John Locke Foundation reprinted The Washington Free Beacon's reporting on HLLI's amicus brief on behalf of a graduate student worker who opposed UAW Local 4811’s apparently-unlawful strike on behalf of so-called “Palestinian Solidarity Encampments.”
The Washington Free Beacon wrote about labor unions prioritizing anti-Israel activism over worker's rights.
HLLI filed a lawsuit on behalf of the National Association of Scholars, challenging the Department of Energy’s mandate requiring Office of Science research grant applications to include a Promoting Inclusive and Equitable Research (PIER) plan.
HLLI represent the National Association of Scholars, who challenge the U.S. Department of Energy’s requirement that researchers submit a DEI statement with applications for research grants.
Reuters covered HLLI's lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison, defending free speech. An expert witness for the state of Minnesota submitted AI-generated documents containing fake, AI-generated citations, and a Minnesota judged ruled that this expert testimony must be excluded.