The John Locke Foundation reprinted The Washington Free Beacon's reporting on HLLI's amicus brief on behalf of a graduate student worker who opposed UAW Local 4811’s apparently-unlawful strike on behalf of so-called “Palestinian Solidarity Encampments.”
The Washington Free Beacon wrote about labor unions prioritizing anti-Israel activism over worker's rights.
HLLI filed a lawsuit on behalf of the National Association of Scholars, challenging the Department of Energy’s mandate requiring Office of Science research grant applications to include a Promoting Inclusive and Equitable Research (PIER) plan.
HLLI represent the National Association of Scholars, who challenge the U.S. Department of Energy’s requirement that researchers submit a DEI statement with applications for research grants.
Reuters covered HLLI's lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison, defending free speech. An expert witness for the state of Minnesota submitted AI-generated documents containing fake, AI-generated citations, and a Minnesota judged ruled that this expert testimony must be excluded.
HLLI filed an amicus brief in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Merrick Garland, opposing the Department of Justice’s emergency motion to stay a nationwide injunction against enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA).
HLLI filed an amicus brief in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Merrick Garland, opposing the Department of Justice’s emergency motion to stay a district court’s nationwide injunction against the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act.
Center of the American Experiment, a think tank in Minnesota, wrote about HLLI's lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison.
The Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute (HLLI), in collaboration with Dhillon Law Group and Young America’s Foundation, filed an amicus brief to protect the free speech rights of two minor students and their mother.
HLLI filed an amicus brief with Dhillon Law Group and Young America's Foundation in support of the free speech rights of two minor students and their mother who are asking the Sixth Circuit to reverse a lower court's decision upholding their school district's ban on clothing in school with the slogan "Let's Go Brandon."
