Archive: Blog – Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute
THE ARCHIVES
Blog Posts
Today, the Center for Class Action Fairness filed an objection on behalf of four class members, including one who gets...
Our appeal has drawn attention from the National Law Journal, Overlawyered, Bob Dorigo Jones, California Civil Justice, Hans Bader, and...
Today, we filed our Ninth Circuit appellate brief in the Bluetooth case, No. 09-56683....
$1.87 million in attorneys' fees for a worthless settlement will not be collected; Judge Vaughn Walker denied settlement approval....
The court's opinion is not quite a rubber-stamp of the defendants' proposed order and opinion, but it's pretty close....
$1.87 million in attorneys' fees for a worthless settlement will not be collected; Judge Vaughn Walker denied settlement approval....
Unlike the Bluetooth case, we were among several plaintiffs who filed substantive objections to this settlement....
Monday, I attended the fairness hearing for the Bluetooth MDL settlement. UCLA math professor and client Henry Towsner was in...
In this case, it's moot: the plaintiffs don't qualify for catalyst theory fees even under California law, and didn't even...
Unlike the Bluetooth case, we were among several plaintiffs who filed substantive objections to this settlement....
Yet still, there were class members who did not hear of the settlement until my Overlawyered post publicizing it--a post...
"If you bought a Bluetooth headset between June 30, 2002 and February 19, 2009, the settlement of a class action...