Archive: Blog – Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute
THE ARCHIVES
Blog Posts
Welcome to those of you who found this page after reading the Wall Street Journal profile....
This week, we objected to a $0 settlement of the Pampers Dry Max class action....
The decision contradicts (and ignores) Bluetooth, Aqua Dots, and the Class Action Fairness Act, and applied the wrong standard of...
It's still unclear to me why the Third Circuit waited a year before our briefs were due from our appeal....
The growth of the Center for Class Action Fairness can be shown just by the breadth of its activities on...
As discussed at Point of Law, CCAF has filed an objection to the Babies “R” Us settlement in McDonough v....
I’ll be arguing the AOL cy pres case June 7 in Pasadena. (My record in Ninth Circuit oral arguments to...
We are mystified how the plaintiffs intend to justify the settlement; perhaps they will contend that the $10 discount "certificates"...
But who has the incentive to hire an expensive attorney to object?...
So why did the attorneys get $2.1 million? Because of the economic fiction of "fees" and "expenses," which are calculated...
The audio file of Monday’s oral argument in the Ninth Circuit in the Bluetooth case is now on line. The...
The briefing by the settling parties in support of final approval seemed exceptionally poor, though I admittedly have never been...