Politico wrote about HLLI’s free speech victory for YouTube and X creator, “Mr Reagan.”
“Most of [the law] acts as a hammer instead of a scalpel,” Senior U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez wrote, calling it “a blunt tool hinders humorous expression and unconstitutionally stifles the free and unfettered exchange of ideas.” He carved out an exception for a “not unduly burdensome” portion of the law that requires verbal disclosure of digitally altered content in audio-only recordings.
Theodore Frank, an attorney for Kohls, said in a statement they were “gratified that the district court agreed with our analysis.”
Read more at Politico.