The Center Square wrote about Leroy v. Livingston Manor School District, in which an appeals court ruled in favor of our client, affirming that public schools cannot punish students for off-campus speech, even if the speech is controversial.
Jane Coleman at Legal Insurrection covered our case, Leroy v. Livingston Manor School District, in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled in favor of a Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute (HLLI) client, reversing a lower court’s decision and affirming that public schools cannot punish students for off-campus speech, even if the speech is controversial.
The Second Circuit has ruled in favor of HLLI's client, a student disciplined for an allegedly insensitive social media post, reversing a lower-court decision and affirming that public-schools cannot punish students for off-campus speech, even if the speech is controversial.
The Volokh Conspiracy wrote about HLLI's brief in Leroy v. Livingston Manor School District defending student free speech.
HLLI petitioned a federal appeals court to recognize a high school student's off-campus social media post as protected speech under the First Amendment, challenging the school district’s disciplinary actions.
HLLI filed an appeal over a school district's unconstitutional punishment of a high school student for his social media post.
