Original Jurisdiction: Judicial Notice (11.24.24): Follow The Leader
Original Jurisdiction wrote about our case, Kohls v. Ellison, where the state of Minnesota filed an export that contained AI hallucinations.
Original Jurisdiction wrote about our case, Kohls v. Ellison, where the state of Minnesota filed an export that contained AI hallucinations.
The Minnesota Reformer reports on the incredible expert declaration by an “AI and misinformation” expert filed in Kohls v. Ellison.
Volokh Conspiracy covers HLLI's motion to exclude testimony from an “AI and misinformation” expert in Kohls v. Ellison, who ironically cited fictional journal articles in his declaration, which were apparently hallucinated by an AI model like ChatGPT.
The Wall Street Journal wrote about HLLI's free speech victory in California over Gov. Newsom's "deepfake" law.
Alpha News in Minnesota wrote about our lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Minnesota’s law, § 609.771, “Use of Deep Fake Technology to Influence and Election,” which bans sharing AI-generated content intended to influence elections.
The Brainerd Dispatch covered Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute's lawsuit in Minnesota on behalf of YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan."
HLLI and Upper Midwest Law Center filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Minnesota's law, § 609.771, which bans AI-generated political satire.
HLLI filed a second lawsuit on behalf of AI-generated political satire, joined the by Upper Midwest Law Center, representing plaintiffs “Mr Reagan,” a political creator, and state Rep. Mary Franson challenging Minnesota Statutes § 609.771.