World Net Daily: Anti-Israel organizations hit with class action lawsuit for coordinating traffic blockades
World Net Daily wrote about our lawsuit, suing the organizations and individuals who engaged in traffic blockades in Washington, D.C.
World Net Daily wrote about our lawsuit, suing the organizations and individuals who engaged in traffic blockades in Washington, D.C.
The Jewish Press wrote about Faoro v. Jewish Voice for Peace Inc., et al., HLLI's case against traffic-disrupting protestors.
Legal Insurrection wrote about our case, Faoro v. Jewish Voice for Peace Inc., et al. We are suing organizations and individuals who engaged in illegal traffic blockades in Washington, D.C.
The Washington Free Beacon wrote about HLLI's case, Faoro v. Jewish Voice for Peace Inc., et al., in which HLLI is suing organizations and individuals who engaged in traffic blockades in Washington, D.C.
The John Locke Foundation reprinted The Washington Free Beacon's reporting on HLLI's amicus brief on behalf of a graduate student worker who opposed UAW Local 4811’s apparently-unlawful strike on behalf of so-called “Palestinian Solidarity Encampments.”
The Washington Free Beacon wrote about labor unions prioritizing anti-Israel activism over worker's rights.
Reuters covered HLLI's lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison, defending free speech. An expert witness for the state of Minnesota submitted AI-generated documents containing fake, AI-generated citations, and a Minnesota judged ruled that this expert testimony must be excluded.
Center of the American Experiment, a think tank in Minnesota, wrote about HLLI's lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison.
Minnesota Reformer wrote an update about our case, Kohls v Ellison, in which a Stanford misinformation expert admitting to using artificial intelligence to draft a court document that contained fake citations about AI.
The Stanford Daily covered our case, Kohls v Ellison, defending free speech, and the state of Minnesota's AI expert, a Stanford professor, submitting AI-generated studies that don't exist.