Legal Insurrection: California’s Crackdown On AI-Generated Political Parody Is Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Says
Legal Insurrection wrote about HLLI's lawsuit for YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan" in defense of parody, satire, and free speech.
Legal Insurrection wrote about HLLI's lawsuit for YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan" in defense of parody, satire, and free speech.
Law360 wrote about HLLI's free speech lawsuit for YouTube and X creator, "Mr Reagan."
New York Post wrote about cy pres and our lawsuit, In re Google Location History Litigation.
“I’m not familiar with the Alabama law. On the other hand, the governor of Alabama had hasn’t threatened our client the way the governor of California did,” HLLI Director Ted Frank told The Associated Press.
Coverage of HLLI's suit on behalf of Christopher Kohls, the person behind the “Mr Reagan,” YouTube and X accounts, who challenges the constitutionality of two bills that Gov. Gavin Newsom says outlaw “Mr Reagan” parody content illegal.
The Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute (HLLI), a public interest law firm, is suing California officials on behalf of “Mr Reagan,” a YouTuber who creates political satire videos.
John Stossel featured the Google Location History settlement as an example of class action abuse and interviewed HLLI attorney Anna St. John.
Campus Reform wrote about HLLI’s civil lawsuit against anti-Israel activists who blockaded the entrance to O’Hare International Airport.
The Washington Free Beacon reported on our civil lawsuit against anti-Israel activists who blockaded the entrance to O’Hare International Airport.
View from the Wing wrote about our lawsuit, Manhart v. AJP Educational Foundation, et al., suing the individuals and organized who participated in the anti-Israel traffic blockade.