How to end pointless class actions, redux
On Wednesday, Bates sided with the objectors. He denied approval of the settlement, finding that it unfairly released class claims for monetary damages.
November 4 Press Release re Marek v. Lane
Chief Justice Roberts acknowledged the need for the Court to address the increasing use of cy pres settlements. He wrote, “…review of this case might not have afforded the Court an opportunity to address more fundamental concerns surrounding the use of such remedies in class action litigation, including when, if ever, such relief should be considered….In a suitable case this Court may need to clarify the limits on the use of such remedies.”
October 15
Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will announce orders relating to two cert petitions we filed.
Mid-September update
Procter & Gamble (but not the plaintiffs) filed an en banc petition seeking further review of the 2-1 decision striking down the ludicrous attorney-benefit-only settlement in Dry Max Pampers. CCAF filed its opposition yesterday. Similarly problematic to the Dry Max Pampers settlement is the case of Richardson v. L'Oreal, a pathetic lawsuit and settlement that seems to have forum-shopping shenanigans. CCAF attorney Adam Schulman filed an objection on behalf of a class member. One tactic class counsel engages in is…
CCAF in today’s New York Times
"The leading critic of abusive class-action settlements is Ted Frank of the Center for Class Action Fairness, and he is one of the lawyers challenging the Facebook settlement. In testimony in March before a House subcommittee, Mr. Frank said Facebook’s payment to the new charity bordered on a sham."
Scourge of carpathia
Some More Updates
HP Inkjet will not be reviewed, cementing our win for class members; mildly successful result in Wyeth.
Sixth Circuit victory: In re Dry Max Pampers Litigation
A great opinion protecting class members against predatory attorneys. Congratulations to CCAF attorney Adam Schulman (Georgetown Law '10), who won his first appellate oral argument.
Diaper deal that gave $2.73M to lawyers, one-box refund to customers is nixed by 6th Circuit
A federal appeals court has overturned a class action settlement that gave the plaintiffs’ lawyers $2.73 million and Pampers customers with receipts and UPC codes a refund on a box of diapers.
Lessons From CCAF On Designing Class Action Settlements
The recent decision by the Sixth Circuit, overturning approval of a class action settlement in In re Dry Max Pampers Litigation (6th Cir. Aug. 2, 2013), is another in a string of wins for the Center for Class Action Fairness, which objects to settlements it considers unjust, and another reminder to class action defendants that they have to bear objections in mind when negotiating settlements.
- Go to the previous page
- 1
- …
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- …
- 34
- Go to the next page