Apple Magsafe class action settlement objection
We've objected to the Apple Magsafe class action settlement, which was recently criticized by AtlanticWire. Details at Point of Law.
Sixth Circuit brief in Pampers Dry Max class action
Details at Point of Law. Fortunately, Procter & Gamble is not my client, as they will be exceedingly unimpressed that we mortifyingly spelled their name wrong throughout the brief. At least the law is right.
Ninth Circuit briefing in In re HP Inkjet complete
See if you can spot the big math error in the HP brief before you read the reply brief.
Festivus update
In the Toys "R" Us baby products antitrust case, the E.D. Pa. approved a settlement and fee request that pays $14M to attorneys and $8.1M to class members over our objection. Law.com describes it as a "24% recovery for the class"; if that's accurate, that raises the question why there will be another $13 million of payments to cy pres recipients not disclosed to the class instead of to the class. Aside from the fact of…
Ninth Circuit cy pres victory in Nachshin v. AOL
We've been at the forefront of noting the problem of abusive cy pres; originally intended as a last resort "second-best" way to benefit the class after resolution of a case where there is leftover money, too many class actions use cy pres as a first resort to exaggerate the class benefits, or to siphon some of those benefits to the class attorneys or the defendants or, shockingly, the judge. A couple of recent decisions…
Welcome, Wall Street Journal readers
Welcome to those of you who found this page after reading the Wall Street Journal profile.
Pampers Dry Max class action settlement objection
This week, we objected to a $0 settlement of the Pampers Dry Max class action.
- Go to the previous page
- 1
- …
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Go to the next page