National Association of Scholars v. DOE
HLLI represent the National Association of Scholars, who challenge the U.S. Department of Energy’s requirement that researchers submit a DEI statement with applications for research grants.
Reuters: Judge rebukes Minnesota over AI errors in ‘deepfakes’ lawsuit
Reuters covered HLLI's lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison, defending free speech. An expert witness for the state of Minnesota submitted AI-generated documents containing fake, AI-generated citations, and a Minnesota judged ruled that this expert testimony must be excluded.
Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute Defends Individual Privacy in Challenge to Corporate Transparency Act
HLLI filed an amicus brief in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Merrick Garland, opposing the Department of Justice’s emergency motion to stay a nationwide injunction against enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA).
Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Pamela Bondi
HLLI filed an amicus brief in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Merrick Garland, opposing the Department of Justice’s emergency motion to stay a district court’s nationwide injunction against the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act.
Center of the American Experiment: Arrogance, incompetence, and Big Government: Why ‘Minnesota has a fraud problem’
Center of the American Experiment, a think tank in Minnesota, wrote about HLLI's lawsuit, Kohls v. Ellison.
Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute Files Amicus Brief Supporting Students’ Free Speech Rights in “Let’s Go Brandon” Case
The Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute (HLLI), in collaboration with Dhillon Law Group and Young America’s Foundation, filed an amicus brief to protect the free speech rights of two minor students and their mother.
B.A., et al. v. Tri County Area Schools, et al.
HLLI filed an amicus brief with Dhillon Law Group and Young America's Foundation in support of the free speech rights of two minor students and their mother who are asking the Sixth Circuit to reverse a lower court's decision upholding their school district's ban on clothing in school with the slogan "Let's Go Brandon."
Minnesota Reformer: Misinformation expert used AI to draft testimony containing misinformation about AI
Minnesota Reformer wrote an update about our case, Kohls v Ellison, in which a Stanford misinformation expert admitting to using artificial intelligence to draft a court document that contained fake citations about AI.
The Stanford Daily: Stanford misinformation expert accused of using AI to fabricate court statement
The Stanford Daily covered our case, Kohls v Ellison, defending free speech, and the state of Minnesota's AI expert, a Stanford professor, submitting AI-generated studies that don't exist.
The Volokh Conspiracy: Acknowledgment of AI Hallucinations in AI Misinformation Expert’s Declaration in AI Misinformation Case
The Volokh Conspiracy wrote about the recent fake AI-generated studies cited by the state of Minnesota's expert in our case, Kohls v Ellison.
